If you want to read easier, press ctrl + A to select all the words.

Monday, April 11, 2011

Armenian Genocide

If you're bored of me of talking, roll the time circle to half of the timeline, there'll be a typing subtitle. Or if some scenes aren't important to you, click the right arrow to come to the next picture or click left arrow to go back the last picture.   ENJOY!

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Gov? Ideas? Equality? ^^

1)However, Viet Nam couldn't be perfect if everyone is equal. I half-agree with the idea of everyone is equal is good because on some cases, people need equality. But I one-hundred-percent believe that it'll never be good if anything is equal.
       The meaning of equality isn't good enough. It makes people equally any way. But we can use a part of equality to operate. For example, the God gave people different lives because of what they did in the life before(in my religion). If they're lucky and blissful, it's because they treated amiably to others and now, they received back what they did. So if they're good but they must accept to be equal with everyone in this life, so what does "fairness" mean? Moreover, people need to have levels to define and affirm themselves. If everyone is equal, so the Beauty salons, Competitions, Companies, etc. need to close because Viet Nam doesn't have no one better, no one more beautiful, no one smarter than anyone. Therefore, those kinds of things won't be necessaries because why do they care about beauty, jobs or winning!
        On the other hand, people can use a part of equality to realize. Like when we went into some shops, if the staffs saw some one luxuriously, the waiters will meet them first and then they welcome we after.
        A part of equality is able to help us equal in fairness of life but not any help for qualities of life

2)Seriously, I'd rather equity then equality, but if it's required, then it'll be like this way.
For shortening, I'd like to do 5 laws:
     1st: everyone is equal but not necessary strict. They can have freedom in limitted spaces like privacy. They couldn't tell their names out, otherwise they wear masks go out without showing their faces. If not, they'll be in jail for 10 years and pay $10.000 for one person they've told to.
     2nd: for someone's intelligent, they're required to work for Government and parliament. To let them equal with others, they must work in secret without anybody in Government tell out their names. But they can choose whatever careers they want and their ideas will be given to government.
     3rd: every where, every time, every place, people must being fair and in organization. Which first is first, which second is second! Right is right and wrong is wrong!
     4th: Education isn't limitted but their studying progress is kept in secret. Every student studies lonely on the internet just with the 3D clever teachers.
     5: People's property can be possessive by its master without telling it to anyone else! If somebody record that anybody have lots of money in their house, their money will be seizure and share to others.

3)For the one who is less having capabilities to live themselves and worse than normal, I'll create a system to find out what ability they can be have (every person has at least 1 capability) and train it very well so they can fill in what they lack.
For someone who has problems in mental, physical or spirit, I'll give them a good and private hospital with some ingenius physicians to look after them. By the time, they'll be controlled to learn with special machines and have many operations to re-take the function of their bodies.

4)It's kind of difficult to answer but I think this way:
       First big problem is fairness. People have talents, they have the opportunities to be better than normal people. We can't stop them from being in the spotlight or affirm themselves to the world. If we keep those good-abnormal people equal to not-good-enough-abnormal people. they won't agree. They have the rights to be the best and the rights to live with their real self. Not forbidding and hiding anything about their talents. I think if we're forced to continue with equalities, we can give them the opportunities to perform themselves but just in privacy
       Second problem is about personalities. Some people are jealousy and greedy, they don't just want be as normal as others, they want to be better than anybody else in the world. They can do anything to serve and satisfy their wishes. They can spread the idea to against the government to get back their choices and freedom in the citizens' thoughts and cause a civil war or even a WW. The solution for this problem is to calm everyone down and give them enough rights to satisfy their desires without harming to the government.

5)Yeah, as I said above, human still need equality but just some things need to, not at all. However, the idea of all things equally are always negative, not even a light in the darkness. Although they're allowed to perform their capabilities, they can't use those things to reject others. There are always government give an eye on those people to make sure they don't dominate others Too much.

6)Equality (in the negative way), first thing goes to my head is about school violence. Here is an example: in a school, a good student has knowledge and always try to improve himself. Some of the students are bulliers always hate good students because they're extremely lazy and really stupid. They want him to take down his performance about his knowledge and down his grades. They tease him and bully him every single day and make him even stressed and unable to learn, but he's scared and keep that in secret. That situation keeps continuing and from that on, no one in class get higher than 80% grades!

To Hazel, when she just watched her son died on TV and forgot all about it, I think about the patients who got Alzheimer, an illness about memory that makes you forget about what happened day-by-day. Usually, people got this sickness higher than 50 years old. People after getting this illness, they'll slowly forget anything day-by-day, even their family, their home, their ages and their memories. They lose all of them piece by piece and surely, they don't know what happened to them since those days even just yesterday.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Effect of AD.

Let's think of this, what do you think about an attractive and fastinating advertisement that makes you being crazy of it? Would you really want to buy them immediately? Same as you, others people will be charmed as well. And they'll buy those stuffs who were advertised by any public medias. So by the way to advertising, it makes more and more people know about them and lots and lots of people will buy them to use.

It has NEVER enough for our world today. For example, if you extremely like that product and you found that, do you think of sustainabilities and then stop buy that thing? I guess not, or maybe someone will stop buying but just a small percentage of population. So, it can't be enough to let people know about sustainibility. In my opinions, I think if we want to inform people know about sustainibility, first, the government should let all citizens ,when they go into shops or mall, take a list of Good and Bad issues when they buy those products. Secondly, all of us, who knows already about sustainability, should inform people by talking, online and usual newspapers, or TV and tell them some of usual and daily examples, that will make people more understanding about sustainability and do it, too.

Curiosity, wanting to have useful function, the desire and Joneses are ones of the most popular personalities that almost person has. As well as students, and we're students, at the dynamic and out-going ages like this, will not accept losing others in any fields of life. Just a small group of people realize it and stop doing chasing. Indeed, when any unique advertisements appear,which can attract people to buy because of useful function or just because of chaising moderinism, could make some of us will buy it. Then, friends saw it and want to buy them, it's a risk for company to sell all of those products whatever they are. So if the company's advertisements are good and alluring, we'll probably know their business will trade flows.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Sustainability

"the people who sewed the shirt together might not have been paid a living wage." -Why do they work for the factory but they don't have any money for their work?
"We call it a footprint because it's like the mark we leave on the earth as we go about our daily activities" -Defination of footprint.
" An ecoligical footprint is measured in acres and it is estimate of the area of productive land and amount of water it takes to support the natural resource comsumption habits of a person, community, or nation." -Defination of ecological footprint.
"There are two major components that affected humanity's ecological footprint: population and comsumption" -Why are these two major affect the humanity ecological footprint? Why is this important?
"Like population growth, consumption habits are not static over time" -I thought it can be moved or stood still based on what people do, not just not static.
 Answers of questions:
1)I thought it is about our lifestyles and with the incomes suitable with those lifestyles. If you have enough conditions for life needs, than you can use the high quality of appliances and recycle things that you used. Additionally, you're orangzied people and economized people, you'll have ideas for keeping your money from using less energies. But if you don't have enough conditions in life, so you have to use the low quality appliances and bad machines. Those low-quality things damaged a lot for our environment, they need lots of energies for activating and working. Thas's a big difference between high income and low income

2)Exemples for:
Energy-efficient appliances: Solar energies and wind energies instead of electricity and hydroelectric
Renewable sources of energy: use the man-made inventions, reuse water, recycle papers,...
Hybrid cars: buy less cars, buy the car enough for seats, use public transportation, walk or ride bicycle in short distances, use cars that don't use animals' skin, nor lots of energies,...
=>People can use less money for these examples above and they don't need to much money.

3)I think instead of that, it'll aware to everyone because if they use those wasting-energies machines, they'll probably pay lots of money for them. Furthermore, today, for their businesses, there are lots of polices be professional in many broad fields like environment, traffic,etc. Therefore, they must follow the laws in a long time and that will be their habbit if they do it for a long time.

4)From reducing our ecological footprint, our lives were going to be high qualities. We pay less money for taxes, less money for buying new things, less area for store trash and garbages, help a part in preserving the environment and protecting the earth.